![]() When an organization uses a geofence for black-or-white policy-making, however, field workers will be afraid of leaving this area. Rather than manually monitor where each field worker is, the geofence can alert organizations to instances when they may not be where they should be. Reduced efficiency Source: PexelsĪ geofence should make teams more efficient. Doing so will cause several problems with their mobile fleet. ![]() To account for these edge cases, enterprises should never use geofencing as the end-all, be-all to keeping track of field workers. Perhaps the worker was invited for an off-site meeting with a client, or they took a wrong turn, which funneled them outside the designated work area. While field workers may indeed leave a geofence for unjustified reasons, such as to run a personal errand on company time, there are just as many legitimate reasons for going outside a geofence. The problem with this approach is that the offender may not even be an offender. For example, when an IT team receives an alert that a field worker has exited a geofence, they may immediately jump into corrective action, such as by issuing a written warning to the offender. Actual Positive: The field worker left a geofence, and did indeed do so for a malicious purpose.īecause geofencing is a powerful tool, organizations that use the feature often rely exclusively on the technology for disciplinary action. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |